6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Leonardo Martino and Trans One Ii, Inc., a Michigan Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Leonardo Martino and Trans One Ii, Inc., a Michigan Corporation Anchor | green | “in assessing whether events or omissions giving rise to the claims are substantial, it is necessary to look at the nature of the dispute.” | 10 |
| 2 | Datasouth Computer Corp. v. Three Dimensional Technologies, Inc. | green | “when both forums are federal district courts, this factor has little relevance because it is unlikely that there would be any significant difference in the difficulty of enforcing a judgment rendered by one federal forum or the other.” | 8 |
| 3 | Teleprompter Corp. v. Polinsky | green | “where . . . defendants have challenged a court's power over their persons and, at same time, have moved alternatively for transfer, the interests of judicial economy are best served by initial address of the transfer issue” | 4 |
| 4 | Farmland Dairies v. McGuire | green | “where the effects of the challenged regulations are felt.” | 4 |
| 5 | Kalman v. Cortes | green | “a substantial portion of the events giving rise to” | 4 |
| 6 | Simon v. Ward | green | “at the time and place of shipment.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.