4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. United States Anchor | green | “the claim must identify who, what, where, when, and how.” | 10 |
| 2 | Teng Moua v. Jani-King of Minnesota, Inc. | green | “a complaint need not be filled with precise detail.” | 10 |
| 3 | E-Shops Corp. v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n | green | “the complexity or simplicity of the transaction or occurrence, the relationship of the parties and the determination of how much circumstantial detail is necessary to give notice to the adverse party and enable him to prepare a responsive pleading,” | 9 |
| 4 | United States v. United States | green | “who, what, where, when, and how” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.