4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Richard Nields v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richard Nields v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden Anchor | green | “the failure to present additional mitigating evidence that is merely cumulative of that already presented does not rise to the level of a constitutional violation.” | 12 |
| 2 | Lee v. State | green | “because the substantive claim underlying the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel has no merit, counsel could not be ineffective for failing to raise this issue.” | 12 |
| 3 | Boyd v. State | green | “trial counsel is not ineffective for having an objection overruled or a motion denied.” | 6 |
| 4 | State v. Frogge | green | “continue looking for experts just because the one he has consulted gave an unfavorable opinion.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.