6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Casey v. Auto-Owners Insurance.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Casey v. Auto-Owners Insurance Anchor | green | “a witness is bound by his or her deposition testimony, and that testimony cannot be contradicted by affidavit in an attempt to defeat a motion for summary disposition.” | 10 |
| 2 | Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. | green | “may admit evidence only once it ensures, pursuant to mre 702, that expert testimony meets that rule's standard of reliability.” | 6 |
| 3 | Teal v. Prasad | green | “must be facts in evidence to support the opinion testimony of an expert.” | 6 |
| 4 | Naccarato v. Grob | green | “failed to provide the recognized standard of practice or care within that specialty as reasonably applied in light of the facilities available in the community or other facilities reasonably available under the circumstances . . . .” | 4 |
| 5 | Teal v. Prasad | green | “there must be facts in evidence to support the opinion testimony of an expert.” | 4 |
| 6 | Decker v. Rochowiak | green | “expert testimony is necessary to establish the standard of care because the ordinary layperson is not equipped by common knowledge and experience to judge the skill and competence of the service and determine whether it meets the standard of practice in the community.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.