2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alexander v. CareSource.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alexander v. CareSource Anchor | green | “conclusory statements unadorned with supporting facts are insufficient to establish a factual dispute that will defeat summary judgment.” | 18 |
| 2 | John Jones v. City of Franklin | green | “onclusory allegations, speculation, and unsubstantiated assertions are not evidence, and are not sufficient to defeat a well-supported motion for summary judgment.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.