4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Harvey.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Harvey Anchor | green | “clear beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have found the defendant guilty absent the error.” | 20 |
| 2 | State v. Harvey | green | “beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained.” | 6 |
| 3 | State v. Harvey | green | “error is harmless if it is 'clear beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have found the defendant guilty absent the error.” | 5 |
| 4 | State v. Hale | green | “beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.