7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Estate of Rennick.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Estate of Rennick Anchor | green | “judicial admissions are defined as deliberate, clear, unequivocal statements by a party about a concrete fact within that party's knowledge.” | 8 |
| 2 | In Re Estate of Rennick | green | “deliberate, clear, unequivocal statements by a party about a concrete fact within that party's knowledge.” | 7 |
| 3 | Peach v. McGovern | green | “it is within the discretion of the circuit court to decide whether evidence is relevant and admissible, and a reviewing court will not disturb the circuit court's decision absent a clear abuse of that discretion.” | 7 |
| 4 | People v. Tyler | green | “since the vast majority of the cases presented by defendant involve allegations of police misconduct by two or more detectives, it is crucial to consider the claims of a systemic pattern of abuse in the context of several officers working together to obtain a false confession in…” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Gibson | green | “never sure, to begin with, exactly who threw which punch, slap, or kick in what order” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Jackson | green | “whether there is sufficient similarity between the misconduct at issue in the present case and the misconduct shown in other cases.” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Harris | green | “whether any of the officers who interrogated defendant may have participated in systemic interrogation abuse” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.