4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jacked Up, LLC v. Sara Lee Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jacked Up, LLC v. Sara Lee Corp. Anchor | green | “those assumptions must have some factual basis in the record and an underlying rationale.” | 10 |
| 2 | Jacked Up, LLC v. Sara Lee Corp. | green | “but there is no requirement that an expert derive his opinion from firsthand knowledge or observation.” | 9 |
| 3 | United States v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp. | green | “even when a court rules that an expert's testimony is reliable, this does not necessarily mean that contradictory expert testimony is unreliable.” | 8 |
| 4 | Jacked Up, LLC v. Sara Lee Corp. | green | “analysis applies to all aspects of an expert's testimony: the methodology, the facts underlying the expert's opinion, the link between the facts and the conclusion, et alia,” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.