7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Taylor.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Taylor Anchor | green | “we review the district court's imposition of a special condition of supervised release for abuse of discretion, so long as the objection was preserved for appeal.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Jonathan Silva | green | “we should not interpret a statute in a manner inconsistent with the plain language of the statute, unless doing so would lead to an absurd result.” | 6 |
| 3 | United States v. Mark Fisher, United States of America v. Devon Sutton, A.K.A. Devon Daniel Sutton, United States of America v. Arthur Robertson | green | “the plain language is presumed to express congressional intent and will control a court's interpretation.” | 5 |
| 4 | United States v. Jonathan Silva | green | “should not interpret a statute in a manner inconsistent with the plain language of the statute, unless doing so would lead to an absurd result.” | 4 |
| 5 | United States v. Mi Kyung Byun | green | “any conduct that by its nature is a sex offense against a minor.” | 4 |
| 6 | United States v. Mi Kyung Byun | green | “fully supported this conclusion.” | 4 |
| 7 | United States v. Mi Kyung Byun | green | “specified offenses against a minor” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.