8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Russell Dusek v. JPMorgan Chase & Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Russell Dusek v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. Anchor | green | “is granted only when the movant demonstrates that the complaint has failed to include 'enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 10 |
| 2 | Rivell v. Private Health Care Systems, Inc. | green | “in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.” | 5 |
| 3 | Settoon Towing, L.L.C. v. Marquette Transportation Co. | green | “courts cannot, without any textual warrant, expand the operation of savings clauses to modify the scope of displacement under opa.” | 3 |
| 4 | Savage Services Corporation v. United States | green | “detailed scheme . . . preempts the general oil-removal remedies that might've been available under . . . the common law.” | 3 |
| 5 | Savage Services Corporation v. United States | green | “even if the opa may not itself contain a waiver of sovereign immunity, vessel owners may still go after the united states for removal costs and damages by bringing common-law admiralty claims against the government pursuant to the saa's sovereign-immunity waiver.” | 3 |
| 6 | Savage Services Corporation v. United States | green | “fragmented collection of federal and state laws providing inadequate cleanup and damage remedies.” | 3 |
| 7 | United States v. American Commercial Lines, L.L.C | green | “preemption refers to whether federal statutory law supersedes state law, while 'displacement' applies when . . . a federal statute governs a question previously governed by federal common law.” | 3 |
| 8 | Mid-Valley Pipeline Co. v. Sunoco Pipeline, L.P. | green | “that the opa 'does not preempt state law in the area of oil spill liability and compensation” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.