3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Devers-Scott v. Office of Professional Regulation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Devers-Scott v. Office of Professional Regulation Anchor | green | “reasonable person could accept . . . as adequate” | 16 |
| 2 | McAdams v. Town of Barnard | green | “arguments not briefed are waived.” | 11 |
| 3 | Devers-Scott v. Office of Professional Regulation | green | “a reasonable person could accept . . . as adequate” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.