8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from John Doe v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John Doe v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation Anchor | green | “minimal but nevertheless ascertainable” | 6 |
| 2 | L. C. v. Olmstead | green | “fundamentally alter the service” | 4 |
| 3 | Vincent L. Chalk v. United States District Court Central District Of California | green | “it was error to require that every theoretical possibility of harm be disproved.” | 4 |
| 4 | Vincent L. Chalk v. United States District Court Central District Of California | green | “it was error to require that every theoretical possibility of hiv transmission be disproved” | 4 |
| 5 | Sidney Abbott v. Randon Bragdon, D.M.D. | green | “dr. bragdon is not entitled to demand absolute safety” | 4 |
| 6 | ESTATE OF | green | “deferring to the medical judgment expressed in the report of the centers for disease control” | 4 |
| 7 | Sidney Abbott v. Randon Bragdon, D.M.D. | green | “the objective, scientific basis for finding a significant risk to the petitioner.” | 4 |
| 8 | Ricky Crawford v. Indiana Department of Corrections | green | “the security concerns that the defendant rightly emphasizes ... are highly relevant to determining the feasibility of the accommodations that disabled prisoners need in order to have access to desired programs and services.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.