4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Giordano.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Giordano Anchor | green | “failure to satisfy any of those statutory requirements that directly and substantially implement the congressional intention to limit the use of intercept procedures to those situations clearly calling for the employment of this extraordinary investigative device.” | 15 |
| 2 | United States v. Chavez | green | “a central, or even functional, role in guarding against unwarranted use of wiretapping or electronic surveillance.” | 6 |
| 3 | United States v. Chavez | green | “every failure to comply fully with any requirement provided in title iii would render the interception of wire or oral communications 'unlawful.” | 6 |
| 4 | United States v. Chavez | green | “not every failure to comply fully with any requirement provided in title iii would render the interception of wire or oral communications 'unlawful.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.