5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rachel Fraenkel v. Islamic Republic of Iran.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rachel Fraenkel v. Islamic Republic of Iran Anchor | green | “mental anguish, bereavement and grief” | 10 |
| 2 | Hill v. Republic of Iraq | green | “more or different evidence than a court would ordinarily receive; indeed, the quantum and quality of evidence that might satisfy a court can be less than that normally required.” | 8 |
| 3 | Oldham v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. | green | “is subject to the discretion of the court and equitable considerations.” | 6 |
| 4 | Oldham v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. | green | “whether pre-judgment interest is to be awarded is subject to the discretion of the court and equitable considerations.” | 5 |
| 5 | Oldham v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. | green | “subject to the discretion of the court and equitable considerations.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.