3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jose Chavez v. James Ziglar.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jose Chavez v. James Ziglar Anchor | green | “analysis under rule 12(c) is substantially identical to analysis under rule 12(b)(6) because, under both rules, a court must determine whether the facts alleged in the complaint, taken as true, entitle the plaintiff to a legal remedy.” | 19 |
| 2 | In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation | green | “courts generally have discretion in granting 12(c) motions with leave to amend, particularly in cases where the motion is based on a pleading technicality.” | 11 |
| 3 | United States v. Kenneth Arpan | green | “the principal difference between motions filed pursuant to rule 12(b) and rule 12(c) is the time of filing. because the motions are functionally identical, the same standard of review applicable to a rule 12(b) motion applies to its rule 12(c) analog.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.