5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Andreea Gociman v. Loyola University of Chicago.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andreea Gociman v. Loyola University of Chicago Anchor | green | “also considers any documents attached to and integral to the complaint as part of the plaintiff's allegations.” | 11 |
| 2 | Leon Palmer v. City of Decatur, Illinois, Decatur Police Department, Defendants | green | “fair and meaningful consideration.” | 8 |
| 3 | Andreea Gociman v. Loyola University of Chicago | green | “draws all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff's favor.” | 8 |
| 4 | Leon Palmer v. City of Decatur, Illinois, Decatur Police Department, Defendants | green | “well-established duty of the trial court to ensure that the claims of a pro se litigant are given a 'fair and meaningful consideration.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.