7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Johnny Rivera, Elena Vila.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Johnny Rivera, Elena Vila Anchor | green | “support the inference that the defendant was aware of a high probability of the existence of the fact in question and purposely contrived to avoid learning all of the facts in order to have a defense in the event of a subsequent prosecution.” | 8 |
| 2 | United States v. William W. Lilly | green | “whether a jury could plausibly find that the actions described in the disputed counts of the indictment, objectively viewed, constituted separate executions of the bank fraud scheme.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. James T. Labat | green | “in arriving at that figure, mr. brandon, i recognize that based on the pre-sentence report, you don't appear to have any assets at the present time but it appears that you have the prospect of receiving or inheriting some assets in the future.” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Johnny Rivera, Elena Vila | green | “only when the facts support the inference that the defendant was aware of a high probability of the existence of the fact in question and purposely contrived to avoid learning all of the facts in order to have a defense in the event of a subsequent prosecution.” | 4 |
| 5 | United States v. Claudia O'campo, United States v. Julian Redeondo | green | “includes conduct in furtherance of the conspiracy that was known to or was reasonably foreseeable by the defendant.” | 4 |
| 6 | United States v. William W. Lilly | green | “in order to obtain a single loan, the proceeds of which funded a single real estate purchase.” | 4 |
| 7 | United States v. Paul J. Savoie | green | “the financial resources of the defendant, the financial needs and earning ability of the defendant and the defendant's dependents, and such other factors as the court deems appropriate.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.