3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Elzbieta Klawitter v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Elzbieta Klawitter v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Anchor | green | “not only supports a contrary conclusion, but indeed compels it.” | 19 |
| 2 | Svitlana Denko v. Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “when the board adopts the decision of the ij in lieu of issuing its own opinion, we review the ij's decision as the final agency decision.” | 8 |
| 3 | Elzbieta Klawitter v. Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “in order to reverse the bia's factual determinations, the reviewing court must find that the evidence not only supports a contrary conclusion, but indeed compels it.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.