2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from LSQ Funding Group, L.C. v. EDS Field Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LSQ Funding Group, L.C. v. EDS Field Services Anchor | green | “a motion in limine is not the proper vehicle to resolve substantive issues, to test issues of law, or to address or narrow the issues to be tried.” | 17 |
| 2 | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Floyd McLEAN, Defendant-Appellant | green | “inherent in this standard is the firm recognition that there are difficult evidentiary rulings that turn on matters uniquely within the purview of the district court, which has first-hand access to documentary evidence and is physically proximate to testifying witnesses and the …” | 16 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.