7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review Board.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review Board Anchor | green | “cases that are otherwise justiciable, but in which a court's decision no longer will have a practical effect on or concerning the rights of the parties, will be dismissed as moot.” | 10 |
| 2 | Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review Board | green | “the court's decision in the matter will have some practical effect on the rights of the parties to the controversy.” | 10 |
| 3 | Kellas v. Department of Corrections | green | “constitutional barriers to litigation with no support in either the text or history of oregon's charter of government.” | 3 |
| 4 | Yancy v. Shatzer | green | “capable of repetition, yet evading review.” | 3 |
| 5 | Yancy v. Shatzer | green | “constellation of related issues” | 3 |
| 6 | Yancy v. Shatzer | green | “encompassed within the broad question of justiciability are a constellation of related issues, including standing, ripeness, and mootness.” | 2 |
| 7 | Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1J | green | “the burden of excising the irrelevant portions of the exhibit to preserve the claimed error.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.