7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Yancey.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Yancey Anchor | green | “a person who is statutorily eligible for pretrial diversion is not presumptively entitled to diversion.” | 6 |
| 2 | State v. Winsett | green | “as complete an application as circumstances warrant.” | 6 |
| 3 | State v. Curry | green | “that a defendant, obviously, bears the burden of demonstrating suitability for diversion does not relieve the prosecutor's obligation to examine all of the relevant factors and to set forth the required findings.” | 5 |
| 4 | State v. Hammersley | green | “the circumstances of the offense and the need for deterrence may alone justify a denial of diversion, but only if (a) all of the relevant factors have been considered as well,” | 5 |
| 5 | State v. Herron | green | “in the first instance, to provide the prosecuting attorney with sufficient background information and data to enable that officer to make a reasoned decision to grant or deny the relief sought.” | 5 |
| 6 | State v. Pinkham | green | “in addition to the foregoing items which the prosecutor should include in a written record, he or she should also identify 'any factual disputes between the evidence relied upon and the petitioner's application.” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Herron | green | “with sufficient background information and data to enable that officer to make a reasoned decision to grant or deny the relief sought.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.