6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fortune Production Co. v. Conoco, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fortune Production Co. v. Conoco, Inc. Anchor | green | “generally speaking, when a valid, express contract covers the subject matter of the parties' dispute, there can be no recovery under a quasi-contract theory.” | 15 |
| 2 | Massey v. Massey | green | “only if the intention of the parties as expressed on the face of the document is doubtful may the court resort to parol evidence to resolve the doubt.” | 6 |
| 3 | Warren Bros. Co. v. A.A.A. Pipe Cleaning Co. | green | “making the contract complete in its terms which show to be incomplete.” | 3 |
| 4 | Marcuz v. Marcuz | green | “an agreement does not express the real intention of the parties” | 3 |
| 5 | Decker v. Urrutia | green | “having to fight about the coverage.” | 3 |
| 6 | Inglish v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America | green | “unjust enrichment claims are predicated on the absence of an express contract controlling the circumstances.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.