5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Jones.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Jones Anchor | green | “our standard of review in addressing a challenge to the denial of a suppression motion is limited to determining whether the suppression court's factual findings are supported by the record and whether the legal conclusions drawn from those facts are correct.” | 11 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Harlan | green | “the evidence presented at the suppression hearing when examining a ruling on a pre-trial motion to suppress.” | 8 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Jones | green | “a challenge to the denial of a suppression motion is limited to determining whether the suppression court's factual findings are supported by the record and whether the legal conclusions drawn from those facts are correct.” | 7 |
| 4 | COM. EX REL. TEJADA v. Beard | green | “the evidence of the commonwealth and so much of the evidence for the defense as remains uncontradicted when read in context of the record as a whole.” | 4 |
| 5 | Com. v. Barnes, Q. | green | “is limited to the evidentiary record that was created at the suppression hearing.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.