4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Ta. T..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Ta. T. Anchor | green | “a decision is against the manifest weight of the evidence when the opposite conclusion is clearly apparent.” | 16 |
| 2 | In Re Veronica J. | green | “demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the parent is 'unfit' under one or more of the grounds set forth in section 1(d) of the adoption act (750 ilcs 50/1(d) (west 2004)).” | 6 |
| 3 | In re Ta. T. | green | “involves factual findings and credibility determinations that the trial court is in the best position to make.” | 6 |
| 4 | In Re ES | green | “the trial court is given broad discretion and great deference in matters involving minors.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.