5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Saunders.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Saunders Anchor | green | “need not go through each factor on the record - it is sufficient that the court acknowledges that it has complied with its statutory duty to consider the factors without further elaboration.” | 10 |
| 2 | State v. Pickens, 89658 (3-27-2008) | green | “need not go through each factor on the record - it is sufficient that the court acknowledges that it has complied with its statutory duty to consider the factors without further elaboration.” | 10 |
| 3 | State v. Smith | green | “fulfills its duty under the statutes by indicating that it has considered the relevant sentencing factors.” | 6 |
| 4 | State v. Long | green | “shall consider the need for incapacitating the offender, deterring the offender and others from future crime, rehabilitating the offender, and making restitution.” | 4 |
| 5 | State v. Hodges | green | “has the full discretion to impose any term of imprisonment within the statutory range, but it must consider the sentencing purposes in r.c. 2929.11 and the guidelines contained in r.c. 2929.12.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.