8 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Glasper.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Glasper Anchor | green | “an adequate colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a knowing and voluntary choice” | 6 |
| 2 | People v. Glasper | green | “engaged the defendant in an adequate colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a knowing and voluntary choice” | 6 |
| 3 | People v. Kelly | green | “failed to advise defendant of the potential periods of incarceration or the potential maximum term of incarceration” | 6 |
| 4 | People v. Hamelinck | green | “although the initial statements of defendant during the factual allocution may have negated the essential element of his intent to cause serious physical injury, his further statements removed any doubt regarding that intent” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Jones | green | “defendant understood that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from those rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Jones | green | “the record as a whole, including the written waiver of the right to appeal, establishes 'that the defendant understood that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from those rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Jones | green | “understood that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from those rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty” | 3 |
| 8 | People v. Rumsey | green | “responses during the plea colloquy and his execution of a written waiver of the right to appeal establish that he intelligently, knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.