6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hui v. Castaneda.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hui v. Castaneda Anchor | green | “section 233(a) grants absolute immunity to phs officers and employees for actions arising out of the performance of medical or related functions within the scope of their employment by barring all actions against them for such conduct.” | 15 |
| 2 | Hatahley v. United States | green | “under the federal tort claims act, damages are determined by the law of the state where the tortious act was committed.” | 5 |
| 3 | Jarrett v. United States | green | “once the community health center is deemed a public health service employee, it enjoys immunity from those acts that relate to its employment, and any actions against it are treated as actions against the united states.” | 3 |
| 4 | County Board of Arlington Co. v. Express Scripts Pharmacy, Inc. | green | “under the statute, private actors can remove a case to federal court when they show that they: (1) acted under the direction of a federal officer; (2) possess a colorable federal defense; and (3) engaged in government-directed conduct that was causally related to the plaintiff's…” | 3 |
| 5 | Brignac v. United States | green | “of continually vetting its physicians is 'inextricably woven' into the provision of medical care” | 3 |
| 6 | West Virginia State University v. The Dow Chemical Company | green | “a federally supported community health center . . . is subject to detailed requirements and oversight by the federal government,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.