4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Minnesota v. Murphy.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Minnesota v. Murphy Anchor | green | “a state may validly insist on answers to even incriminating questions and hence sensibly administer its probation system, as long as it recognizes that the required answers may not be used in a criminal proceeding and thus eliminates the threat of incrimination.” | 20 |
| 2 | People v. Patrick | green | “the contempt power of the circuit court is a proper sanction for a violation of probation” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Colclasure | green | “because of the court's inherent contempt power and because the comments of the group drafting the unified code of corrections indicate that the format of the code was adopted with a recognition of the existence of that inherent power as one added sanction, we deem the court to h…” | 4 |
| 4 | People v. Gallinger | green | “the contempt power of the circuit court is a proper sanction for a violation of probation” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.