4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Armstrong v. Schwarzenegger.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Armstrong v. Schwarzenegger Anchor | green | “what is important, and what the plra requires, is a finding that . . . the 'relief' . . . corrects the violations of the prisoners' rights with as minimal of an impact as possible on a prison's discretion over their policies and procedures.” | 9 |
| 2 | Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Carl Petrick | green | “that cannot be resolved one way or the other at the hearing on the injunction because they require more deliberative investigation.” | 9 |
| 3 | Melissa Ahlman v. Don Barnes | green | “3626(a)(2) provides no way to extend a preliminary injunction other than making the injunctive relief final.” | 8 |
| 4 | Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Carl Petrick | green | “(1) they are likely to prevail on the merits of their substantive claims, (2) they are likely to suffer imminent, irreparable harm absent an injunction, (3) the balance of equities favors an injunction, and (4) an injunction is in the public interest.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.