3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ronald Lambert v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ronald Lambert v. United States Anchor | green | “the doctrine of equitable tolling preserves a plaintiff's claims when strict application of the statute of limitations would be inequitable.” | 16 |
| 2 | Brockman v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice | green | “when the plaintiff knows or has reason to know of the injury which is the basis of the action.” | 9 |
| 3 | Ronald Lambert v. United States | green | “equitable tolling preserves a plaintiff's claims when strict application of the statute of limitations would be inequitable.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.