4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sooner Products Company v. Paul Mcbride.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sooner Products Company v. Paul Mcbride Anchor | green | “must specifically present facts tending to show agreement and concerted action.” | 10 |
| 2 | Sooner Products Company v. Paul Mcbride | green | “when a plaintiff in a 1983 action attempts to assert the necessary 'state action' by implicating state officials or judges in a conspiracy with private defendants, mere conclusory allegations with no supporting factual averments are insufficient; the pleadings must specifically…” | 10 |
| 3 | Johns v. Stewart | green | “the eleventh amendment does not permit judgments against state officers declaring that they violated federal law in the past.” | 7 |
| 4 | Sooner Products Company v. Paul Mcbride | green | “standard is even stricter where the state officials allegedly involved in the conspiracy are immune from suit, as are the state court judges” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.