6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Anne Ruggiero, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Albert Ruggiero v. Warner-Lambert Company and Parke Davis, Docket No. 04-6674-Cv.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anne Ruggiero, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Albert Ruggiero v. Warner-Lambert Company and Parke Davis, Docket No. 04-6674-Cv Anchor | green | “when an expert opinion is based on data, a methodology, or studies that are simply inadequate to support the conclusions reached, daubert and rule 702 mandate the exclusion of that unreliable opinion testimony.” | 7 |
| 2 | United States v. Jones | green | “while the proponent of expert testimony has the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the admissibility requirements of rule 702 are satisfied, . . . the district court is the ultimate gatekeeper.” | 7 |
| 3 | Anne Ruggiero, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Albert Ruggiero v. Warner-Lambert Company and Parke Davis, Docket No. 04-6674-Cv | green | “that are simply inadequate to support the conclusions reached, daubert and rule 702 mandate the exclusion of that unreliable opinion testimony.” | 6 |
| 4 | United States v. Williams | green | “(1) whether a theory or technique has been or can be tested; (2) 'whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication;' (3) the technique's 'known or potential rate of error' and 'the existence and maintenance of standards controlling the technique'…” | 5 |
| 5 | In Re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation | green | “assertions that the witness lacks particular educational or other experiential background, 'go to the weight, not the admissibility, of the testimony.” | 4 |
| 6 | United States v. Jones | green | “the fundamental requirements are thus that such evidence be relevant and reliable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.