6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Auerbach v. Parker.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Auerbach v. Parker Anchor | green | “it is well settled that, after remand, the trial court should comply strictly with the mandate of the appellate court by entering and implementing the appropriate judgment.” | 6 |
| 2 | Denney v. Forbus | green | “visitation rights are a part of custody determinations.” | 6 |
| 3 | Ex Parte Alabama Power Co. | green | “no judgment other than that directed or permitted by the reviewing court may be entered.” | 5 |
| 4 | Durbin v. Durbin | green | “where an appellate court gives no precise directions as to how a case is to proceed as to a certain matter on remand, the lower court may proceed in any manner that is not inconsistent with the appellate court's opinion.” | 5 |
| 5 | Rsc v. Jbc | green | “overnight and other unsupervised 'visitation' removes children from the presence and control of their parents and gives complete control and authority over the child for a period of time to another adult, essentially effecting a temporary or 'partial custody.” | 5 |
| 6 | Ex parte Marshall County Department of Human Resources | green | “the child's custody is to be vested in the father at the completion of the transitional period ....” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.