4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wood v. Starko.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wood v. Starko Anchor | green | “in order for the evidence to preponderate against the trial court's finding of fact, the evidence must support another finding of fact with greater convincing effect.” | 12 |
| 2 | Wood v. Starko | green | “in order for the evidence to preponderate against the trial courts findings of fact, the evidence must support another finding of fact with greater convincing effect.” | 9 |
| 3 | GSB Contractors, Inc. v. Hess | green | “the amount of damages to be awarded in a particular case is essentially a fact question,” | 8 |
| 4 | Tiffany Shockley, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Terry Street v. Mental Health Cooperative, Inc. | green | “including dictionary definitions,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.