4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rankin v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rankin v. State Anchor | green | “a claim regarding sufficiency of the evidence need not be preserved for review at the trial level and is not waived by the failure to do so.” | 18 |
| 2 | Moff v. State | green | “a claim regarding sufficiency of the evidence need not be preserved for appellate review at the trial level, and it is not forfeited by the failure to do so.” | 7 |
| 3 | Young v. State | green | “affirmative findings necessary to sustain the imposition of an enhanced punishment.” | 4 |
| 4 | Idowu v. State | green | “filed a pro se notice of appeal and an affidavit of financial status in support of a request for appellate counsel, and that he was indeed given the assistance of appellate counsel.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.