7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 217 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fuentes v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fuentes v. State Anchor | green | “is the sole judge of the credibility of the witnesses and of the strength of the evidence.” | 136 |
| 2 | Guevara v. State | green | “attempts to conceal incriminating evidence, inconsistent statements, and implausible explanations to the police are probative of wrongful conduct and are also circumstances of guilt.” | 36 |
| 3 | Trimble v. Itz | green | “intent can be inferred from the acts, words, and conduct of the accused.” | 26 |
| 4 | Franks v. State | green | “if other evidence at trial is admitted without objection and it proves the same fact or facts that the inadmissible evidence sought to prove” | 8 |
| 5 | Davidson v. State | green | “article 38.22's recording requirement for an oral statement is a procedural evidentiary rule rather than a substantive exclusionary rule.” | 4 |
| 6 | Zarate v. State | green | “any comparison to current events must be evaluated in the context of the times” | 4 |
| 7 | Holberg v. State | green | “article 38.22, 3(a), applies only to oral statements made during custodial interrogation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.