5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Kelvin Williams (071306).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Kelvin Williams (071306) Anchor | green | “in assessing the sufficiency of the evidence on an acquittal motion, we apply a de novo standard of review.” | 8 |
| 2 | State v. Kelvin Williams (071306) | green | “we must determine whether, based on the entirety of the evidence and after giving the state the benefit of all its favorable testimony and all the favorable inferences drawn from that testimony, a reasonable jury could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 8 |
| 3 | State v. Kelvin Williams (071306) | green | “must determine whether, based on the entirety of the evidence and after giving the state the benefit of all its favorable testimony and all the favorable inferences drawn from that testimony, a reasonable jury could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 7 |
| 4 | State v. Samuels | green | “when 'each of the interconnected inferences necessary to support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is reasonable on the evidence as a whole,' judgment of acquittal is not warranted.” | 6 |
| 5 | State v. Reginald Roach (068874) | green | “hold that the testimony of the original person to have performed forensic testing is required in all instances, regardless of the type of testing and the knowledge and independence of review and judgment of the testifying witness.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.