3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Patricia Vance v. Nancy A. Berryhill.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Patricia Vance v. Nancy A. Berryhill Anchor | green | “(i) the claimant's daily activities; (ii) the duration, frequency, and intensity of the claimant's pain; (iii) precipitating and aggravating factors; (iv) the dosage, effectiveness, and side effects of medication; and (v) the claimant's functional restrictions.” | 13 |
| 2 | Laura Julin v. Carolyn W. Colvin | green | “credibility determinations are the province of the alj, and as long as good reasons and substantial evidence support the alj's evaluation of credibility, courts will defer to the alj's decision.” | 12 |
| 3 | Charles Bryant v. Nancy A. Berryhill | green | “part of the residual-functional-capacity determination includes an assessment of the claimant's credibility regarding subjective complaints.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.