4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Munson v. Gaetz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Munson v. Gaetz Anchor | green | “we also question whether munson alleges an actual deprivation of his property given that it appears from munsons complaint, and from his counsels statement at oral argument, that the prison sent the interdicted books to a member of his family.” | 6 |
| 2 | Martin v. Spalding | green | “when an inmate is given the option of retaining ownership but sending the property out of the institution, the inmate has not lost ownership, and the loss of possession during the inmates prison term is not a sufficient taking to implicate due process rights.” | 6 |
| 3 | Duck River Electric Membership Corp. v. City of Manchester | green | “he constitutional prohibitions against taking private property without just compensation applies with full force and validity to personal property.” | 6 |
| 4 | Pryor-El v. Kelly | green | “where an inmates personal property is seized and sent to an address of his choosing, such an action is not a deprivation.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.