4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Lanza.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Lanza Anchor | green | “an act denounced as a crime by both national and state sovereignties is an offense against the peace and dignity of both and may be punished by each.” | 21 |
| 2 | Houston v. Moore | green | “might be pleaded in bar of the prosecution before the other.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Lanza | green | “it follows that an act denounced as a crime by both national and state sovereignties is an offense against the peace and dignity of both and may be punished by each.” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Lanza | green | “dual sovereignty" doctrine provides that "an act denounced as a crime by both national and state sovereignties is an offense against the peace and dignity of both and may be punished by each” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.