4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dunn v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dunn v. United States Anchor | green | “a variance arises when the evidence adduced at trial establishes facts different from those alleged in an indictment.” | 19 |
| 2 | United States v. John Fox | green | “mere association with conspirators, even with knowledge of their involvement in crime, is insufficient to prove participation in their conspiracy.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. John Fox | green | “proof of the existence of a buyer-seller relationship, without more, is inadequate to tie the buyer to a larger conspiracy.” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Patrick Wayde Mealy and Lance B. Spotts | green | “the fact that one party to a conversation is a government informant does not preclude the admission of the conspirator's statements under rule 801(d)(2)(e).” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.