3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management Anchor | green | “analysis under rule 12(c) is 'substantially identical' to analysis under rule 12(b)(6) because, under both rules, a court must determine whether the facts alleged in the complaint, taken as true, entitle the plaintiff to a legal remedy.” | 14 |
| 2 | Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. | green | “to survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter to state a facially plausible claim to relief.” | 10 |
| 3 | Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. | green | “sufficient factual matter to state a facially plausible claim to relief.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.