5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Grider v. Keystone Health Plan Central, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grider v. Keystone Health Plan Central, Inc. Anchor | green | “appellants respond that the settlements did not moot the appeals because the appellants experienced (and continue to experience) reputational harm. this court's precedent supports appellants' position.” | 5 |
| 2 | Lioce v. Cohen | green | “he district court may, on a party's motion or sua sponte, impose sanctions for professional misconduct at trial, after providing the offending party with notice and an opportunity to respond.” | 5 |
| 3 | Westview Drive Investments, LLC and Jack Yetiv v. Landmark American Insurance Co., and King-Phillips Insurance Agency, Inc. AKA Insurtrust Insurance | green | “courts have the inherent power to discipline attorneys, and the texas supreme court has addressed some violations of the disciplinary rules under both the state bar's disciplinary system and its own inherent powers.” | 5 |
| 4 | State v. Perez | green | “judicial finding of professional misconduct is tantamount to an official sanction, irrespective of whether the finding is made in the context of a formal grievance proceeding.” | 5 |
| 5 | Mary E. McClellan v. Elaine E. Bucklo | green | “finding of attorney misconduct in a sanctions order can seriously impair an attorney's professional standing, reputation, and earning possibilities.. . . such an injury, inflicted in a formal judicial order, can be serious enough to make the order appealable.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.