4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Norris v. Baxter Healthcare Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Norris v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. Anchor | green | “logically advances a material aspect” | 10 |
| 2 | Roe v. FCA US | green | “sufficient data, sound methods, and the facts of the case.” | 10 |
| 3 | Mathis v. Huff & Puff Trucking, Inc. | green | “702 imposes upon the trial judge an important gate-keeping function with regard to the admissibility of expert opinions.” | 6 |
| 4 | United States v. Richter | green | “an expert may not state legal conclusions drawn by applying the law to the facts, but an expert may refer to the law in expressing his or her opinion.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.