Topic: intrusive and far-reaching federal judicial intervention in… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #12236

4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Taylor v. Freeman.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Taylor v. Freeman Anchor
ca4 · 1994
green “intrusive and far-reaching federal judicial intervention in the details of prison management is justifiable only where state officials have been afforded the opportunity to correct constitutional infirmities and have abdicated their responsibility to do so.” 11
2 Lisa Henderson v. Bluefield Hospital Co., LLC
ca4 · 2018
green “unnecessary to address all four factors when one or more had not been satisfied” 8
3 Leaders of Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore Police Department
ca4 · 2021
green “each of these four factors must be satisfied to obtain preliminary injunctive relief.” 7
4 Frank E. Wetzel v. Ralph Edwards, Etc.
ca4 · 1980
green “the decisions made by prison administrators in their informed discretion have been accorded 'wide-ranging deference' by the federal courts.” 5

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check