3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 213 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Trevizo v. Berryhill.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trevizo v. Berryhill Anchor | green | “specific, clear, and convincing” | 144 |
| 2 | PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration | green | “if it is not necessary to decide more, it is necessary not to decide more.” | 58 |
| 3 | PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration | green | “if it is not necessary to decide more, it is necessary not to decide more” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.