4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Clarence E. Grubbs v. Robert D. Hannigan Attorney General of Kansas.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clarence E. Grubbs v. Robert D. Hannigan Attorney General of Kansas Anchor | green | “accept the jury's resolution of the evidence as long as it is within the bounds of reason.” | 19 |
| 2 | Ronald Beachum v. Robert Tansy | green | “to be sufficient, the evidence supporting the conviction must be substantial; that is, it must do more than raise a mere suspicion of guilt.” | 6 |
| 3 | Case v. Mondragon | green | “sufficiency of the evidence can be considered to be a mixed question of law and fact.” | 3 |
| 4 | Ronald Beachum v. Robert Tansy | green | “must be substantial; that is, it must do more than raise a mere suspicion of guilt.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.