2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Spotz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Spotz Anchor | green | “has held that an issue will be deemed to be waived when an appellant fails to properly explain or develop it in his brief” | 21 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Hallman | green | “this court may not act as counsel for an appellant and develop arguments on his behalf” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.