7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from BinRashed v. Gonzales.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BinRashed v. Gonzales Anchor | green | “supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.” | 7 |
| 2 | Abdelhadi Hor v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States | green | “is something a government does, either directly or by abetting (and thus becoming responsible for) private discrimination by throwing in its lot with the deeds or by providing protection so ineffectual that it becomes a sensible inference that the government sponsors the miscond…” | 6 |
| 3 | Yetunde Balogun v. John D. Ashcroft | green | “the evidence compels a different result,” | 5 |
| 4 | Bolante v. Mukasey | green | “subjectively genuine and objectively reasonable.” | 5 |
| 5 | Abdelhadi Hor v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States | green | “persecution is something a government does, either directly or by abetting (and thus becoming responsible for) private discrimination by throwing in its lot with the deeds or by providing protection so ineffectual that it becomes a sensible inference that the government sponsors…” | 4 |
| 6 | Mei Dan Liu v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States | green | “it is the details that reveal the severity of the particular situation,” | 3 |
| 7 | Bolante v. Mukasey | green | “is subjectively genuine and objectively reasonable.” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.