3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Conroy v. Vilsack.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conroy v. Vilsack Anchor | green | “the proponent of expert testimony bears the burden of showing that the testimony is admissible.” | 18 |
| 2 | Cook v. Rockwell International Corp. | green | “rule 702 mandates a liberal standard” | 10 |
| 3 | Vigil v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RY. CO. | green | “thus, the proponent of expert testimony must show that the witness' experience, and resultant specialized knowledge, is sufficiently related to the issues and evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.